Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Kingsland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 13 December 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL].


Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL]

I thank the Minister for her observations. Bearing in mind that whoever is selected under the provision will be called a judge, I suggest that it would be desirable to be a little more specific in the Bill than the general words that are there at the moment. She helpfully suggested certain possible categories, such as those who have had a career in the academic world, who might be appointable. Would she consider a guideline provision or some similar provision in the Bill which set out the categories which the noble and learned Lord might have in mind? I entirely agree with the observation of the noble Lord, Lord Maclennan of Rogart, when he said that he thought that the category was too open-ended. I very much share that view and I do not see that the Government would be excessively inconvenienced were they to try to put pen to paper and think about all possible permutations of background that might fall within the description. Otherwise, we will end up calling an extremely wide range of individuals as judges in a way that might be found rather confusing.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
687 c50-1GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Appeals Asylum Finance Legal aid scheme Judiciary Immigration Judgements Qualifications Membership Public appointments Tribunals Council on Tribunals Tribunals Service
Legislation
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk