Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 13 December 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL].


Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL]

With the greatest respect to the chief justice of Malawi, this is not about specific individuals or specific jobs; it is about possible qualifications. The Lord Chancellor would not be able under this piece of legislation to do what the noble Lord quite rightly fears might happen. The provision sets out certain qualifications that people have that would make them eligible for the pool; it is not about specific appointments. The noble Lord’s worst fears would not be realised within the current legislation. That is my understanding of the drafting from parliamentary counsel. We sought to say that there are people within a category of qualification. The example I use, which is as far-fetched as the noble Lord’s one but which makes the point, is that those who have held Commonwealth chief justice positions for more than 10 years and have received the qualifications set out in so doing would as a category be eligible. That would be the equivalent, which I hope gives the alternative view.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
687 c54GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Appeals Asylum Finance Legal aid scheme Judiciary Immigration Judgements Qualifications Membership Public appointments Tribunals Council on Tribunals Tribunals Service
Legislation
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk