Proceeding contribution from Lord Maclennan of Rogart (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 13 December 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL].
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL]
As my intentions are similarly probing, it will not be necessary for me to take much longer than the noble Lord, Lord Kingsland, in speaking to the amendment, to which my noble friend Lord Thomas of Gresford has attached his name. The Law Society supports this change of language, simply because it is again anxious to make the tribunal system as consumer-friendly as possible and ““division”” is thought to be more so than ““chamber””. I must confess that my real interest is in the structure and I hope that the Minister will be able to say something about that.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 687 c55GC
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Appeals Asylum Finance Legal aid scheme Judiciary Immigration Judgements Qualifications Membership Public appointments Tribunals Council on Tribunals Tribunals Service
- Legislation
- Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:46:07 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_365176
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_365176
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_365176