Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Bernard Jenkin (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 14 December 2006. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Serious Fraud Office Investigation.


Serious Fraud Office Investigation

I am bound to say that I regard this whole episode as a sorry one. The Serious Fraud Office has been on a lengthy fishing expedition that has proved abortive. Although I accept entirely what the hon. and learned Gentleman has said about the director of the Serious Fraud Office, the office has had to restrain itself from extending the fishing expedition for an extra 18 months. That suggests that the most important point that the Government need to address is that raised by my hon. Friend the Member for Beaconsfield (Mr. Grieve). Will the Solicitor-General reiterate that we need a thorough review of the way in which this law is operating? If national security is to have a bearing on the activities of the Serious Fraud Office in this field, that should be much more clearly stated as such. The Serious Fraud Office should not be tempted to go on these fishing expeditions unless it is absolutely clear that prosecutions are both likely and in the national interest.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
454 c1124 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Criminal investigation Corruption Arms trade Serious Fraud Office Saudi Arabia Project Al Yamamah BAE Systems
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk