Proceeding contribution from Mike O'Brien (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 14 December 2006. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Serious Fraud Office Investigation.
Serious Fraud Office Investigation
The hon. Gentleman claims that there was substantial progress, but I am not sure how he justifies that claim. The Attorney-General and I met the SFO team, and its view was that it would take 18 months to make what the hon. Gentleman thinks amounts to substantial progress. It would take a considerable time just to get to the point at which the SFO could consider whether to undertake a prosecution. He may just dismiss that, but the director of the SFO and the Attorney-General had to balance national security interests, the length of time involved, the implications, and the question mark over whether a prosecution would take place. A decision had to be made, and it was made properly.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 454 c1127
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Criminal investigation Corruption Arms trade Serious Fraud Office Saudi Arabia Project Al Yamamah BAE Systems
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:53:55 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_366216
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_366216
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_366216