Proceeding contribution from Lord Berkeley (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 December 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill.
Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill
My Lords, I am grateful to my noble and learned friend for giving way. I was interested to hear his statement about lack of public funds being an excuse for not doing something. I suggest that lack of funds could not be used as an excuse for a private sector company not to do something. Would this measure apply to local authorities as well if they said that they did not have enough money to do something? Would they not be charged with corporate manslaughter if an incident arose in those circumstances? It seems an odd reason to put forward for keeping Crown immunity.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 687 c1957
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Clubs Armed forces Death Companies Directors Crown immunity Corporate manslaughter Disqualification Liability Jurisdiction Health and safety Fines Exemptions Government departments Emergency services Police Prosecutions Management Police custody Public bodies Negligence Training
- Legislation
- Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill 2005-06 to 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:59:50 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_366917
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_366917
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_366917