Proceeding contribution from Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 22 January 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Legal Services Bill [HL].
Legal Services Bill [HL]
I support my noble friend. I ask the Minister why the word ““prejudiced”” has been chosen, particularly as I feel that my noble friend's alternative of ““improperly constrained or influenced”” really meets the circumstances that the Government envisage here. ““Prejudiced”” is a much wider and stronger word. It would be helpful to know why that word has been chosen. I hope that the Minister agrees with my noble friend’s amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 688 c975
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Consumers Competition Legal profession Education Lord Chief Justice Standards Training Regulation Solicitors Legal Services Board
- Legislation
- Legal Services Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:16:42 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_371738
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_371738
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_371738