Proceeding contribution from Baroness Butler-Sloss (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 22 January 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Legal Services Bill [HL].
Legal Services Bill [HL]
I am not entirely sure how appropriate it is to put forward ideas which do not come within the existing amendments. However, I hope that the Minister might consider a possible alternative under Clause 31, headed ““Directions””. I suggest that subsection (1)(a) should read, "““that an act or omission of an approved regulator is likely to have an adverse impact””." If one could ask the board to take into account and be satisfied, having taken into account their duties under Clause 3, which refers back to its general duties, it may be that that would meet what was needed. I do not know; I have not consulted anyone else. I am concerned that this does not necessarily remind the board of its Clause 3 duties.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 688 c989
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Consumers Competition Legal profession Education Lord Chief Justice Standards Training Regulation Solicitors Legal Services Board
- Legislation
- Legal Services Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:16:45 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_371776
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_371776
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_371776