Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 31 January 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL].


Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL]

My Lords, I am very worried about the precedent that I have set. I was going to say that when the noble Lord, Lord Kingsland, opposed the relevant provision, he was ably supported by the noble Lord, Lord Newton, and I said that I would reconsider it. Noble Lords may remember that during that debate I explained that the provisions were based on a requirement of Cabinet Office guidance on the creation of non-departmental public bodies. My officials have since queried the guidance and it has been acknowledged that provisions allowing removals without cause are inappropriate. I understand that the guidance has now been revised accordingly. I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Kingsland, for tabling the amendment. We would have tabled our own had he not done so, but he deserves the credit. I have no hesitation in accepting it. On Question, amendment agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
689 c262 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Complaints Consumers Disadvantaged Courts Administration of justice Cultural heritage Credit Debt collection Enforcement Legal aid scheme Judiciary Isle of Man Private sector Powers of entry Northern Ireland Public appointments Museums and galleries Ombudsman Standards Tribunals Training Security Regulation Security Industry Authority
Legislation
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk