Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Newton of Braintree (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 31 January 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL].


Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL]

My Lords, I intervene on this part of the Bill with some trepidation, because I have not followed it with the care with which I have followed the earlier parts. I listened with considerable attention to my noble friend Lord Lucas. While I am simply not in a position to either associate myself with, or dissociate myself from, some parts of his overall argument, I noted his last point in particular, which involves the relationship between complaint handlers or ombudsmen and the courts. That is exactly the point on which I hope to focus attention later, in a wider sense, with regard to Amendment No. 96 and the new clause it contains. Without feeling that I wish to make some great declaration, I shall be particularly interested to hear the Minister’s comments on the last point my noble friend made about precisely that relationship.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
689 c286 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Complaints Consumers Disadvantaged Courts Administration of justice Cultural heritage Credit Debt collection Enforcement Legal aid scheme Judiciary Isle of Man Private sector Powers of entry Northern Ireland Public appointments Museums and galleries Ombudsman Standards Tribunals Training Security Regulation Security Industry Authority
Legislation
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk