Proceeding contribution from Tony McNulty (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 31 January 2007. It occurred during Debate on Police.
Police
With the best will in the world, I have to demur. We are talking about seeking to reduce the impact of changes in formula across the country. We want to consider the impact of the changes—which are all in the right direction, by the way; all the changes in resources are upward. We want to equalise the impact across the country, as a prelude to ensuring a more level playing field in police finance, as the right hon. Member for West Derbyshire suggests. With the greatest respect to my hon. Friend, it is not enough for any Member to talk about ““bleating””, or to give any other such description of counties that benefit—at least for now—from the ceiling, rather than otherwise. I ask people to resist the notion that there are winners and losers, although I know that I will hear plenty more comments to that effect in our debate from colleagues on both sides of the House. The overall context is one of significant interest in resourcing for policing, so that everyone is a winner. It is not appropriate language to talk about the ““cumulative losses”” of authorities that have been at the wrong end of the floors and ceilings.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 456 c241
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Crime prevention Crime Association of Chief Police Officers Finance Police Recruitment Police authorities Police community support officers Standards
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:49:42 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_374722
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_374722
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_374722