Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Tony McNulty (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 31 January 2007. It occurred during Debate on Police.


Police

Perhaps I should have been nastier, in that case. To return to my speech—I will respond to individuals’ substantial contributions later if there is time—I hope hon. Members will indulge me if I do not dwell on the 20 pages left as a result of my taking so many interventions. I will just make some broad points. I take seriously what hon. Members have said about damping the formula. Having looked, lived and breathed the figures for so long, I say in all sincerity that there is a need for a substantive debate on where we are going with the local element of police finance and the huge disparity between authorities. I do not say that in any way to cast doubt on how we have got to where we have. As I said to some hon. Members, history is largely responsible for it, but it cannot be right to have such a huge spread between the level of the precept and how much it contributes to the overall budget in what should be, taking account of variations in local circumstances, a national service delivered regionally and locally through constabularies. There will be issues around that.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
456 c250 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Crime prevention Crime Association of Chief Police Officers Finance Police Recruitment Police authorities Police community support officers Standards
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk