Proceeding contribution from Lord Tomlinson (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 7 February 2007. It occurred during Ministerial statement on House of Lords: Reform.
House of Lords: Reform
My Lords, I thank my noble and learned friend for repeating the Statement made by my right honourable friend Jack Straw. I can assure him that the fact that it sounded no better on repetition was not a reflection of his reading of it. Jack Straw laid great emphasis in his Statement on reaching a consensus. What consensus does my noble and learned friend believe exists among his noble friends sitting behind him? How does he evaluate the level of support towards that consensus? Secondly, can my noble and learned friend explain the point, in paragraph 18, of a ““partially open list”” for elections? I have grappled with that concept and it is beyond me, but perhaps he can apply his legal mind to it and explain it. Finally, as there is great emphasis on the need for accountability driving change, can he explain to me how accountability is served by election for a 15-year term with no possibility of seeking re-election?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 689 c723
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Criminal records Bishops Elections House of Lords Disqualification Hereditary peers House of Lords composition Electoral systems General elections Public appointments Political parties Peers Reform Voting rights Resignations
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:05:01 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_376628
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_376628
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_376628