Proceeding contribution from Andrew Dismore (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 19 February 2007. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Human Rights.
Human Rights
The Conservative Front-Bench spokesman raised the issues of the margin of appreciation and of proportionality, which are of course interpreted by our courts domestically. The European Court of Human Rights is reluctant to interfere with such domestic court decisions unless absolutely necessary. If there is no domestic court ruling, it is more likely that a claimant would be found against when interpreting the margin of appreciation and proportionality, rather than the other way round, simply because we would not have that domestic element to rely on.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 457 c92
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Civil liberties Data protection Courts Bill of Rights Human rights European Convention on Human Rights European Court of Human Rights National security Protection Treaties United Nations Religious freedom
- Legislation
- Human Rights Act 1998
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:16:47 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_377702
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_377702
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_377702