Proceeding contribution from John Denham (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 22 February 2007. It occurred during Legislative debate on Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism.
Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism
My hon. Friend may or may not share my enthusiasm for some elements of the French system in this context. As he will know, in France there is often a three-way meeting between the police, the investigating magistrate and the justice department, at the stage when the files are looked at. A tactical and strategic decision is then taken whether to proceed to detention, as the French often do, or to allow the investigation to run further—perhaps for two or three months—in the hope of obtaining prosecutable evidence. I hope that the review will allow the British system to evolve in that way. If the proper audit trail showed that a prosecution could not be mounted, but that it might be possible in a few months if extra evidence had been accumulated, it should be possible to take the decision to allow the investigation to run.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 457 c439
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Electronic surveillance Human rights Prosecutions Terrorism Security Anti-terrorism control orders
- Legislation
- Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (Continuance in force of sections 1 to 9) Order 2007
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:39:29 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_379104
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_379104
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_379104