Proceeding contribution from John Denham (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 28 February 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Offender Management Bill.
Offender Management Bill
I believe that we need a Bill, because although there are challenges—to say the least—in respect of a regional commissioning structure, it is not clear where else that function could be handled. I cannot see how it could be done easily under existing legislation. I know there is a debate about that point and my view may be wrong, but sometimes it is better that such things are set out in legislation. I do not want to take too much of the House’s time, but perhaps I could give an analogy. When I was a Health Minister I introduced all the legislation that set up primary care trusts. Arguably, no legislation was required, but it was better to have all the provisions in one piece of legislation.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 457 c979
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Contracts Admissibility of evidence Accountability Charities Age Evidence Local government Offenders Mental illness Private sector Pilot schemes Qualifications Prisons Public sector Probation Offences against children Lie detectors Rehabilitation Voluntary organisations Training Sexual offences Wales Testing Reoffenders Speech and language therapy Probation trusts
- Legislation
- Offender Management Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:46:06 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_380808
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_380808
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_380808