Proceeding contribution from Rob Marris (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 5 March 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL].
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [Lords]
I may share the hon. Gentleman’s reservations about some consultations, but the example he has just given is not a very good one. The proposal to abolish the post of Lord Chancellor went out to consultation, following which the post was not abolished. Ergo, it appears that the Government took account of the consultation.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 457 c1316
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Consumers Administration of justice Bankruptcy Cultural heritage Credit Debt collection Fees and charges Enforcement Legal aid scheme Eligibility Judiciary Exemptions Harassment Powers of entry Public appointments Museums and galleries Property Proof of identity Tribunals Training Regulation Sequestration of assets Security Industry Authority
- Legislation
- Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:58:15 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_381900
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_381900
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_381900