Proceeding contribution from James Brokenshire (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 5 March 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [HL].

Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [Lords]

I thank the hon. Gentleman for giving way. Is he aware that the Government have, in part, accepted the logic of his point about the distinction between commercial and residential purposes, particularly on the issues of distraint and rent arrears? As the Government accept the distinction in that context, they are not a million miles away from moving on to the issues that he is addressing.

Secondary information

Type: Proceeding contribution
Reference: 457 c1327
Session: 2006-07
Chamber / Committee: House of Commons chamber
Subjects: Consumers Administration of justice Bankruptcy Cultural heritage Credit Debt collection Fees and charges Enforcement Legal aid scheme Eligibility Judiciary Exemptions Harassment Powers of entry Public appointments Museums and galleries Property Proof of identity Tribunals Training Regulation Sequestration of assets Security Industry Authority
Legislation: Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link: View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk

Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Bill [Lords]

Secondary information

Librarians' tools