Proceeding contribution from Lord Crickhowell (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 March 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Serious Crime Bill [HL].
Serious Crime Bill [HL]
The fact of the matter is that the word ““significant”” is there not to be helpful but to restrict; you will be able to make your case only if the change will be ““significant””. My argument was that all the things in Clause 5 are significant, and the Minister is therefore not answering my point.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 690 c799
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Criminal proceedings Crime prevention Crime Charities Companies Crown Prosecution Service Firearms Environment Exemptions Insolvency Pollution Property Mental health Poaching Registration Serious Fraud Office Robbery Serious Organised Crime Agency Angling High Court Northern Ireland Department of the Director of Public Prosecutions Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office Serious crime prevention orders
- Legislation
- Serious Crime Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:34:59 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_385226
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_385226
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_385226