Proceeding contribution from Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 21 March 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Serious Crime Bill [HL].
Serious Crime Bill [HL]
The noble Baronessasks a reasonable and fair question. I do not havethe answer. It is perhaps more complex than the worked-up examples that we have been through. We would like to reflect on the point before we provide her with a response; we might want to give further thought to it. It is worth simply saying that the whistleblower would in some, perhaps most, circumstances be able to argue that what they did was reasonable. I think that the Law Commission gave some thought to this and tried to anticipate that sort of situation. I would like to reflect more on this than I have been able to this afternoon at the Dispatch Box. Perhaps I may give this further thought and write to the noble Baroness in our correspondence on some of these worked-up examples. I think that she makes a fair point.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 690 c1257
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Data protection Criminal proceedings Codes of practice Crime prevention Crime Conspiracy Aiding and abetting Fraud Inchoate offences Personal records Trials Information sharing
- Legislation
- Serious Crime Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:17:10 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_386749
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_386749
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_386749