Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Glentoran (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 21 March 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Bill.


Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Bill

On a point not directly to do with this Bill, we have all at different times complained about the groupings. I remind myself and everybody else that we have perfect access to the groupings in advance, and we have a right to change them. If the groupings are not to our satisfaction it is our fault. I can tell the noble Lord, Lord Lester, that I felt the same way on Monday, but it was my fault for not having checked them. It would have helped had they been checked and grouped rather better. I have one question before deciding on the merits of the noble Lord’s amendment. Why have the Government decided that a closed and finite list is necessary? I understand that the word ““means”” in this subsection, as opposed to the word ““includes””, means that it is a closed list, and that it is not relevant to anything anywhere else. I should be interested to know whether that is the case.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
690 c201GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Ammunition Administration of justice Armed forces Arrests Human rights Inspections Equipment Powers of entry Northern Ireland Police Powers Prisons Police interrogation Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission Stop and search Reparation by offenders Equality Commission for Northern Ireland
Legislation
Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk