Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Richard Caborn (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 28 March 2007. It occurred during Legislative debate on Betting, Gaming and Lotteries.


Betting Gaming and Lotteries

I think it is outrageous to attack their integrity. Professor Crow’s integrity has been attacked this afternoon, and I think that is disgraceful. The panel took evidence around the country for 16 months, in every area in which there was to be a casino, whereas the Committee in the other place took 16 hours. The arguments against the order have been predicated on a report of a Committee that interviewed two witnesses for 16 hours. I suggest that the hon. Gentleman read the 150 pages of written evidence to the Committee, because he would find that different views were expressed. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State said earlier that this had been a transparent and open process delivered by a panel of professionals. When she made a statement to the House some eight weeks ago on the issue, the hon. Member for East Devon said"““I thank the right hon. Lady for giving me advance sight of her statement, and I add my congratulations to Manchester on its success in securing the proposed regional casino. I and my party hope that that will bring the promised regeneration to that great city in the north-west. We also congratulate all the other successful bidding authorities.””—[Official Report, 30 January 2007; Vol. 456, c. 87.]"


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
458 c1595 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Casinos Licensing Gambling Greater Manchester Great Yarmouth Low incomes Regeneration Blackpool
Legislation
Gambling (Geographical Distribution of Casino Premises Licences) Order 2007
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk