Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Richard Caborn (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 28 March 2007. It occurred during Legislative debate on Betting, Gaming and Lotteries.


Betting Gaming and Lotteries

The hon. Gentleman simply does not understand what the casino panel was doing. Contrary to what the hon. Member for East Devon has been saying, in paragraph 84 of its report the panel said of its remit:"““Moreover, we note that the 2005 Act””," which does not seem to have been referred to tonight,"““sets out ‘licensing objectives’ related to preventing crime and disorder and the protection of children and young persons from harm. Not only are these considerations implicit therefore in providing the best test of social impact, but are also essential considerations regarding regeneration as we see it.””" That is what the Crow report clearly stated about its terms of reference. The panel, as it was asked, reflected the fact that the body that will police the 2005 Act, in which those basic principles are implicit, is the Gambling Commission. It is the commission that will take that responsibility.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
458 c1596 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Casinos Licensing Gambling Greater Manchester Great Yarmouth Low incomes Regeneration Blackpool
Legislation
Gambling (Geographical Distribution of Casino Premises Licences) Order 2007
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk