Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Norman Lamb (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 24 April 2007. It occurred during Opposition day on Modernising Medical Careers.


Modernising Medical Careers

I am grateful to the hon. Lady for that intervention. I disagree with the right hon. Member for Birkenhead (Mr. Field), who seems to think that establishing who was responsible is a pointless exercise: it is essential if we are to hold the Government to account and learn lessons for the future. The hon. Lady made a point about the costs of the recovery exercise. I put that question to the Secretary of State during her statement last week. I did not get an answer, so I would be grateful if the Minister of State could confirm what assessment has been made of the likely additional cost of the recovery exercise. I was making a point about piloting. The terms of reference of the review highlight several features of the system. They include the assessment methodologies used in the selection process, including the relative merits of competency-based and more traditional methods of selection and recruitment; the level of choice on offer at application; and the lack of flexibility available to trainees on run-through programmes. They are all issues that would emerge from pilot programmes and the problems would be ironed out before a programme was rolled out nationally. How on earth was the system introduced without proper piloting?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
459 c819-20 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Doctors Hospitals Resident doctors General practitioners NHS Recruitment Medicine Training
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk