Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Park of Monmouth (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 25 April 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Serious Crime Bill [HL].


Serious Crime Bill [HL]

My Lords, I apologise to the House for coming late and therefore, perhaps, asking a stupid question, but I must ask it. As we are discussing serious crime, I am not perfectly clear whether the reference to intercept evidence would then lap over into terrorism trials. Do terrorism trials come under serious crime, or are they in a class by themselves? If the latter, I reiterate what I have said many times: we should take the advice of Sir Swinton and others not to use intercept evidence. As I say, however, perhaps this point has been covered. I was not entirely clear whether the implications for terrorism trials lapping over from this are what I fear.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
691 c677 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Admissibility of evidence Criminal proceedings Crime prevention Crime Companies Civil proceedings Aiding and abetting Electronic surveillance Evidence Intelligence services Firearms Judiciary Liability Learning disability Judgements Inchoate offences Northern Ireland Offensive weapons Lord Chancellor's Department Mental health Terrorism Security Wales Serious Organised Crime Agency High Court Serious crime prevention orders
Legislation
Serious Crime Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk