Proceeding contribution from Viscount Bledisloe (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 25 April 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Serious Crime Bill [HL].
Serious Crime Bill [HL]
My Lords, the noble Baroness talks about bringing the amendment back at Third Reading. Can she explain how within the rules of procedure she can possibly justify bringing it back for the third time at that stage rather than testing the opinion of the House now?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 691 c686
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Admissibility of evidence Criminal proceedings Crime prevention Crime Companies Civil proceedings Aiding and abetting Electronic surveillance Evidence Intelligence services Firearms Judiciary Liability Learning disability Judgements Inchoate offences Northern Ireland Offensive weapons Lord Chancellor's Department Mental health Terrorism Security Wales Serious Organised Crime Agency High Court Serious crime prevention orders
- Legislation
- Serious Crime Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:36:32 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_392276
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_392276
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_392276