Proceeding contribution from Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 25 April 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Serious Crime Bill [HL].

Serious Crime Bill [HL]

My Lords, of course I accept the bona fides of the noble Baroness and the Government, but she has not explained why it has been found possible to do what I seek to do in so many other different countries with systems similar to ours. In those circumstances, I wish to test the opinion of the House. On Question, Whether the said amendment(No. 21) shall be agreed to? *Their Lordships divided: Contents, 182; Not-Contents, 121. [*The Tellers for the Contents reported 182 votes; the Clerks recorded 183 names.] Clause 4 [Involvement in serious crime: supplementary]: [Amendment No. 22 not moved.]

Secondary information

Type: Proceeding contribution
Reference: 691 c697
Session: 2006-07
Chamber / Committee: House of Lords chamber
Subjects: Disclosure of information Admissibility of evidence Criminal proceedings Crime prevention Crime Companies Civil proceedings Aiding and abetting Electronic surveillance Evidence Intelligence services Firearms Judiciary Liability Learning disability Judgements Inchoate offences Northern Ireland Offensive weapons Lord Chancellor's Department Mental health Terrorism Security Wales Serious Organised Crime Agency High Court Serious crime prevention orders
Legislation: Serious Crime Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link: View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk

Serious Crime Bill [HL]

Secondary information

Librarians' tools