Proceeding contribution from Tom Harris (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 25 April 2007. It occurred during Legislative debate on Crossrail Bill [Instruction] (No. 5).
Crossrail Bill [Instruction] (No. 5)
I am grateful to my hon. Friend for his comments. I would also like to add my thanks to the officials in the Department for Transport and at Cross London Rail Links Ltd for their tremendous efforts. Today, we are debating a motion to allow the Committee to consider petitions against the additional provision to the Crossrail Bill that the Government intend to bring forward. Notwithstanding the Committee’s support for the principle of a station at Woolwich, its role will be to consider petitions against the additional provision, which I have no doubt that it will do with its usual dedication and commitment—especially now that it can see the light at the end of the tunnel. I want to emphasise that the decision to bring forward an additional provision is not a commitment to build a station at Woolwich—it is a commitment to work towards a financial deal that would enable us to have a station at no additional cost to the Crossrail project. However, if Parliament approves the additional provision, and the deal can be finalised successfully, Woolwich station will be just as much part of the Crossrail project as the other new sub-level stations contained in the Bill. There is widespread agreement that Crossrail is a project of immense importance to the United Kingdom, and one whose momentum continues to build. The Government recognise that there are transport capacity challenges in London and the south-east, and we are working hard to address them. Connecting the economic centres in the capital with areas outside London will support local and national economic development and regeneration, benefiting the whole country. Both sides of the House have given strong support to Crossrail throughout the passage of the Bill, and I am grateful for that. The project would be enhanced by a station at Woolwich, provided that that can be achieved without adding to the public funding requirement. I commend the motion to the House.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 459 c949
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Costs Construction Elizabeth line Crossrail Finance Greater London Infrastructure Jubilee line Railway stations Railways Railway network Woolwich Docklands Light Railway Berkeley Group Select Committee on the Crossrail Bill
- Legislation
- Crossrail Bill 2004/05 to 2005-06 to 2006-07 to 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-03-16 09:30:52 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_392539
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_392539
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_392539