Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Andrews (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 30 April 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Greater London Authority Bill.


Greater London Authority Bill

I was not at all being flippant when I said they should refer to the Act. I accept the difficulties there are in accessing legislation, and I do not have a complete answer for that. My instinct would have been to suggest that the Mayor's office should be rung and discussions had directly with his staff who are there to inform the public about access. We know the Mayor is open he takes the process of democratic engagement very seriously—and I would have thought that was a place to start. I will write to the noble Lord, because he is making an important point. The question was raised of the nature of consultation and what guidance there may be on it. Cabinet Office guidance is issued on consultation processes. Although those are essentially government processes, the guidance creates a framework of expectation about what should go into making a thorough and meaningful consultation. That is a useful framework in itself. I reiterate that I appreciate the opportunity to have this debate, but I am afraid we cannot accept the noble Baroness's amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
691 c14GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Related items
Deposited Paper HDEP 2007/425
Monday, 21 May 2007
Deposited papers
House of Lords
Subjects
Greater London Greater London Authority Functions Local government Pay Powers Public appointments Members Staff Mayor of London London Assembly
Legislation
Greater London Authority Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk