Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 30 April 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Serious Crime Bill [HL].


Serious Crime Bill [HL]

My Lords, we have not specified the number; we have simply said that there will be more than one. Potentially, a numberof organisations will put themselves forward for consideration. We agree with the noble Baroness, Lady Anelay, that it would not be right to have a monopoly of just one. Therefore, we will set a code or benchmark to govern the way in which these organisations operate, but it would be improper and wrong for me to suggest that there would be two, three or more. The most important thing is to make a judgment about which organisation or organisations may be fit for this purpose. However, as the noble Baroness has indicated and as others have also said, it is clear that it would be wrong to have only one, because that would create a monopoly and we do not think that that would be right.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
691 c875-6 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Codes of practice Crime prevention Crime Assets Recovery Agency Audit Commission Fraud Electronic surveillance Evidence Firearms Local government NHS Northern Ireland Police Powers National identity register Wales Right of search Revenue and Customs Serious Organised Crime Agency Serious crime prevention orders Information sharing
Legislation
Serious Crime Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk