Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 30 April 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Serious Crime Bill [HL].


Serious Crime Bill [HL]

My Lords, I am most grateful to the noble Baroness for that tribute to my valour. I shall have to take it a step further, however, because I did not hear a single word from her which indicated a reason for rejecting the amendment. She said that she cannot imagine that the children’s database will ever be used for the detection of fraud but that it cannot be ruled out. She agrees that the identity card register, when it comes into being, is not to be used for data mining, but that it cannot be ruled out. I do not see that as a proper answer to the amendment and I feel it necessary, as a matter of principle, to seek the opinion of the House. On Question, Whether the said amendment(No. 99A) shall be agreed to? Their Lordships divided: Contents, 54; Not-Contents, 141 Schedule 6 [Data Matching]: [Amendment No. 100 not moved.]


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
691 c891 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Disclosure of information Data protection Databases Codes of practice Crime prevention Crime Assets Recovery Agency Audit Commission Fraud Electronic surveillance Evidence Firearms Local government NHS Northern Ireland Police Powers National identity register Wales Right of search Revenue and Customs Serious Organised Crime Agency Serious crime prevention orders Information sharing
Legislation
Serious Crime Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk