Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hanningfield (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 May 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Greater London Authority Bill.


Greater London Authority Bill

I was rather heartened by the Minister’s first comments because it seems that we all support this organisation and want to make certain that it is funded. I do not think the amendment would have been tabled were there not the fear that things might not work out properly. As the noble Baroness, Lady Hamwee, said, this is supported by all parties in the Assembly. I am disappointed at the latter part of the Minister’s argument. I always find that, where there is a will to do something, there is usually a way to do it. I know that it is a small issue, but I repeat that it is very important to Londoners. I am disappointed with the arguments, but I note what the Minister has said. We shall probably come back to the matter. I shall read what she has said and think about it, and beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
691 c68GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Accountability Civil servants Health Finance Elections Licensing Greater London Greater London Authority Functions Local government NHS Membership Public appointments Olympic Games Mayor of London London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority Taxis Visual impairment Transport Regulation Safety Transport for London London Transport Users' Committee London Development Agency Pedicabs
Legislation
Greater London Authority Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk