Proceeding contribution from Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 May 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Statistics and Registration Service Bill.
Statistics and Registration Service Bill
I will study what the Minister has said. I take issue with him on the point that, if the United Nations decided—after the comprehensive consultative process when it first introduced the code—that the code required some amendment or strengthening, it would be inconceivable that the board and the whole of the UK statistical system would not want to come into line. His argument that we should not put it in the Bill because it might be changed therefore seems fanciful. The Minister has rather scraped the barrel with his argument against putting this in the Bill, but I will study what he has said. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 53 not moved.] Clause 9 agreed to. Clause 10 [Code of Practice for National Statistics]:
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 691 c1098
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Codes of practice Finance Government departments European communities Financial markets Staff Office for National Statistics Statistics United Nations Retail prices index Information Commissioner's Office UK Statistics Authority
- Legislation
- Statistics and Registration Service Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:00:41 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_394358
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_394358
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_394358