Proceeding contribution from Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 May 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Statistics and Registration Service Bill.
Statistics and Registration Service Bill
We have an amendment in this group to insert ““Cabinet Office”” instead of ““Treasury””, which reflects those amendments passed last week that give the residual functions, in central government, to the Cabinet Office rather than the Treasury; we think that the Cabinet Office is the appropriate place. For the reason given by the noble Lord, Lord Howard of Rising, it seems perverse that Scottish, Welsh and Irish Ministers would be consulted but not the main body of government. It might seem slightly surprising that we are suggesting an additional area on which the Treasury—in this case, the Cabinet Office—should be consulted, as we have been keen to reduce its influence, but, as I said, it seems perverse not to do so in this case.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 691 c1111-2
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Codes of practice Finance Government departments European communities Financial markets Staff Office for National Statistics Statistics United Nations Retail prices index Information Commissioner's Office UK Statistics Authority
- Legislation
- Statistics and Registration Service Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:00:47 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_394388
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_394388
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_394388