Proceeding contribution from Baroness Andrews (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 9 May 2007. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Greater London Authority Bill.
Greater London Authority Bill
In my experience of dealing with legislation in this House, there is nearly always an argument about putting any list in a Bill. Lists can be exclusive, and there is constant pressure to add or subtract people, institutions or organisations. Having something in the Bill makes it, by definition, difficult to amend and more rigid. That is one reason why we specify in secondary legislation that there is a better opportunity to be more responsive and flexible. I will repeat what we said because it deals with what the noble Lord wants to improve on. We will require the Mayor to publish a document setting out those persons he would permit to appear before him and be heard. We have provided for that in the draft order. That achieves a balance between us not dictating to the Mayor and ensuring that he is under genuine discipline to determine to whom he will listen. I think that that is the proper balance.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 691 c193GC
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Housing Greater London Greater London Authority Landfill Local government Planning Recycling Mayor of London Waste disposal London Assembly Water Waste Sewers
- Legislation
- Greater London Authority Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-06-30 18:36:01 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_395591
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_395591
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_395591