Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Verma (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 10 May 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Bill [HL].


Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Bill [HL]

moved, as an amendment to Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 4: 4: After Clause 1, leave out lines 281 to 295 The noble Baroness said: The amendment probes the potential powers of the magistrates’ court. I appreciate that powers are not yet extended to the magistrates’ courts, but would still like to ask some questions about how this would be implemented. I refer particularly to Schedule 5 to the Family Law Act 1996, which allows the High Court or a county court to remand a person under proposed new Section 63K. A magistrates’ court would be unable to carry out such powers under Part 4 without amendment to the Magistrates’ Courts Act. If and when jurisdiction is extended to magistrates’ courts under proposed new Section 69N, will the magistrates’ courts have the same powers as the High Court or the country court—that is, jurisdiction to deal with contempt of court in respect of a breach of a relevant order with imprisonment of up to two years? Should there be provision for summary offences in England and Wales? I suspect that this may not be necessary, because the High Court and the county court have wide powers to deal adequately with a breach of order, but I look forward to the Minister’s response. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
691 c270GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disability Children Courts Arrests Women Domestic abuse Ethnic groups Forced marriage Northern Ireland Protection Powers Religion Remand in custody Forced Marriage Unit Forced marriage protection orders
Legislation
Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk