Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Viscount Astor (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 15 May 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Digital Switchover (Disclosure of Information) Bill.


Digital Switchover (Disclosure of Information) Bill

My Lords, Amendment No. 9 was originally my amendment in Committee. Since then, my noble friend Lord Howard has put forward Amendment No. 10, which is much superior to Amendment No. 9, but as they are a group we can debate them together. I realise, having received a letter from the Minister, that one cannot command the National Audit Office to do something; one can only prod, advise or otherwise encourage it, and that is what Amendment No. 10 does. This is important. Subsection 5(c) of Schedule 2B of the agreement between the Secretary of State and the BBC, which mentions the NAO, does not go far enough. My noble friend’s Amendment No. 10 goes further. For all the reasons we talked about on the previous amendment, we must remember that although it is licence fee money, the licence fee is a tax and this is taxpayers’ money. It should therefore be scrutinised. I support my noble friend’s amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
692 c173 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Care homes Cost effectiveness BBC Costs Digital broadcasting Digital technology Housing benefit Fees and charges Eligibility EU law Government assistance Flats Procurement Multiple occupation Parliamentary scrutiny National Audit Office Visual impairment Take-up Digital switchover help scheme Television licences
Legislation
Digital Switchover (Disclosure of Information) Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk