Proceeding contribution from Lord Dholakia (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 21 May 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Offender Management Bill.
Offender Management Bill
I am grateful for that explanation. However, there is very little difference between what the legislation proposes and what these Benches propose. There is an analogy with race relations legislation. It was all very well people talking about the Commission for Racial Equality and public authorities eliminating racial discrimination, but hardly anything happened until a duty was in place to promote equality. The same applies here. The provision places a duty on agencies and other bodies to co-operate. The ultimate aim is the same, but the amendment boosts that obligation and will be far more effective. I plead, as others have done, with the Minister to take this back, look at it carefully and see whether those bodies can co-operate much more closely than has happened so far.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 692 c497
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Crime prevention Crime Administration of justice Offenders Lord Chancellor's Department Police cautions Probation National Offender Management Service Rehabilitation Trusts Reoffenders Local area agreements Probation boards Probation trusts
- Legislation
- Offender Management Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:12:24 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_398523
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_398523
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_398523