Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl of Northesk (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 23 May 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Statistics and Registration Service Bill.


Statistics and Registration Service Bill

moved Amendment No. 192: 192: Clause 40, page 18, line 14, after second ““information”” insert ““— ““(a)”” The noble Earl said: I shall also address Amendments Nos. 194, 196 and 198. As the Committee will be aware, Clauses 40 and 41 sanction the disclosure of patient registration information to the board—such disclosure duly constrained by subsections (3), (4) and (5). So far so good. Obviously, such data will be invaluable in preparing population statistics. Neither do I doubt that the terms of Clause 36(3) leach into those two clauses. To the extent that they do, that is both welcome and useful. However, given the extreme sensitivity of personal medical information, the same level of protection as exists under Clause 36 should apply to those two clauses and should be expected in the drafting. Hence the amendment. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
692 c741 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Census Intelligence services Government departments NHS Patients National security Personal records Northern Ireland Public interest Staff Office for National Statistics Scotland Statistics Registration Statistics Commission UK Statistics Authority Information sharing
Legislation
Statistics and Registration Service Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk