Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 5 June 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Offender Management Bill.


Offender Management Bill

The noble Lord, Lord Warner, would have a stronger point if the Government had not conceded already by Clause 4 that they are in trouble and have had to ring-fence some of the original services. So I do not take the strictures of the noble Lord, Lord Warner, in that respect. The existing parliamentary scrutiny of the formation and dissolution of probation boards was helpful. As we move into a new area, which I hope will be very successful and wish well, parliamentary scrutiny is important. I am always aware that if we casually discard the right of the two Houses to exercise parliamentary scrutiny, we never get it back again. It is with that in mind that, while I shall withdraw Amendment No. 55, I give notice that I will seek to press Amendment No. 59 to a Division. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 56 to 58 not moved.]


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
692 c1055 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Conditions of employment Contracts Councillors Finance Rehabilitation Private sector Offenders Qualifications Pay Membership Management Magistrates Probation Standards National Probation Service for England and Wales Voluntary organisations Training Probation trusts Probation officers
Legislation
Offender Management Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk