Proceeding contribution from Viscount Tenby (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 5 June 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Offender Management Bill.
Offender Management Bill
I apologise for interrupting, but we rather galloped on. I did not know that people were not going to speak to and support the amendment; I was waiting for others to come in as well, but that is my fault. The noble Baroness made the point that it was considered at an earlier stage that the boards were becoming top heavy, which was one reason for doing away with magistrates—not local authority representatives, of course. Will one extra member make the whole enterprise lurch into complete incompetence and inability to get things done? If we were talking about 15, 10 or even five, perhaps, but one? Furthermore, that one is from the one area that has a tremendous interest in the legal process, what happens to the offenders and everything else.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 692 c1061
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Contracts Councillors Finance Rehabilitation Private sector Offenders Qualifications Pay Membership Management Magistrates Probation Standards National Probation Service for England and Wales Voluntary organisations Training Probation trusts Probation officers
- Legislation
- Offender Management Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-01-08 21:04:45 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_400560
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_400560
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_400560