Proceeding contribution from Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 5 June 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Offender Management Bill.
Offender Management Bill
It is still as clear as mud, but the Minister was trying to be helpful. He gave an answer as to why my amendment is not necessary, and I understand that he has done so in order to put it on the record. It certainly is a probing amendment just to tease out what the Explanatory Notes actually mean. I shall have a look at Hansard to see if the response means more to me tomorrow than it does tonight. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 93 not moved.] [Amendment No. 94 had been withdrawn from the Marshalled List.]
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 692 c1112
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Contracts Courts Charities Offenders Private sector Management Probation Rehabilitation Sentencing Standards Voluntary organisations Training
- Legislation
- Offender Management Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:30:22 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_400627
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_400627
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_400627