Proceeding contribution from Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 6 June 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.
Pensions Bill
This may be a rather nitpicking point, but in the amendment subsection (3)(a) of new Section 50B says ““must”” and (b) says ““may””. In the Bill, it is the other way around. This amendment is a technical replacement for the words in the Bill, so why have we had this—I think the word is probably—transvergence?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 692 c1136
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Assets Annuities Investment Insolvency Government assistance Financial assistance scheme Personal savings Workplace pensions Pensions Pension funds Pension Protection Fund Married people Pension rights Overseas residence
- Legislation
- Pensions Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:39:09 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_401244
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_401244
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_401244