Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Martin Horwood (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 12 June 2007. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Carbon Dioxide Reduction Target.


Carbon Dioxide Reduction Target

I do not entirely accept that. There are plenty of scenarios in which we can maintain our intention of phasing out nuclear power and achieve up to a 94 per cent. reduction in carbon emissions from energy from electricity generation over the requisite time scales. The dash for gas, not active Government policy, is responsible for the reduction that we have achieved in greenhouse gas emissions. Since then, the position has been getting worse. We are 18 per cent. over the domestic carbon reduction target. Do such short-term targets matter? Of course they do, because they are markers for how well we are progressing towards achieving the longer-term targets. The way in which we fulfil them is critical. If we make slow reductions at the outset and expect to make a steep rush at the end, that is different from sharp reductions early on, as Sir Nicholas Stern recommended, because the total volume of CO2 emitted in that period is much greater.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
461 c730 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Air pollution Climate change Carbon dioxide Pollution control Standards Carbon emissions Government Carbon Offsetting Fund
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk