Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Morris of Aberavon (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 June 2007. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Iran: HMS ““Cornwall””.


Iran: HMS ““Cornwall””

My Lords, I have repeatedly asked, in many ways, whether there was adequate ministerial cover during the important period after the release of the sailors—which has been referred to as the ““fiasco period””—and I am always referred back to the terms of reference of the inquiries. Of course they do not cover it—unless ““learning lessons”” is sufficiently all-embracing. Will the Minister now tell the House whether there was a gap in ministerial cover and the availability of a Minister to be consulted by his staff at that time? Was there a duty Minister, or is what has been referred to in the Statement as the ““abstention of judgment”” the nearest we can get to an admission that no one was on duty?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
693 c132 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Detainees Iraq Payments Peacekeeping operations Media Navy Ministry of Defence Training Territorial waters Reviews Iran Marines HMS Cornwall
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk