Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Turner of Camden (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 June 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Greater London Authority Bill.


Greater London Authority Bill

My Lords, this is another set of amendments from the parties opposite that seem designed to write into the Bill powers that the Assembly does not have at present but which were available when the GLC was in operation. As I have said previously, the Assembly is not the GLC. We now have a new set of legislative provisions before us that provide for a powerful Mayor—which everyone has accepted, apparently—which means that he is obliged to perform certain functions. I really cannot see any point in writing into the Bill that a copy of the candidate’s application must be attached, when it is already written in the schedule that the Mayor must include, "““the reasons why the candidate is the person that the Mayor proposes to appoint to the office””." I would have thought that that was the most important point. The amendment would add an enormous amount to what is written into the Bill and is not required at all. The Government have provided clarifications in their own amendments and I would have thought that they were sufficient. The amendments of the two parties opposite are quite unnecessary.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
693 c148-9 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Greater London Greater London Authority Local government Public appointments Public expenditure Mayor of London London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority Transport for London Visits abroad London Development Agency
Legislation
Greater London Authority Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk