Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 June 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Greater London Authority Bill.
Greater London Authority Bill
My Lords, speaking of maturity, I am getting older by the minute. Why? Because it is the Assembly’s budget. It is not directly comparable with, for example, the Transport for London budget. If the Assembly is able to set its own budget, that could be the answer. Real politics involves very polarised political groups. I can well envisage a new Mayor wanting to make a big political statement with a number of Assembly Members—the big political statement will be more important than the scrutiny work that will be carried out over the next four years—and that group blocking the required majority. As to the reputational risk, the Mayor is left to protect his reputation and I think that we should let the Assembly take care of its reputation. Having said that, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 24 not moved.] Clause 14 [Substitute calculations]: [Amendment No. 25 not moved.] [Amendment No. 26 not moved.]
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 693 c183
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Finance Greater London Greater London Authority Local government Powers Public appointments Public expenditure Mayor of London Transport for London London Assembly London Transport Users' Committee Public health
- Legislation
- Greater London Authority Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:58:02 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_403954
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_403954
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_403954