Proceeding contribution from Stephen Hammond (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 28 June 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Concessionary Bus Travel Bill [Lords].
Concessionary Bus Travel Bill [Lords]
Indeed it would. I hope that after some reflection, the Minister will see the intent, significance and advantage of new clause 3. I have indicated that one of the advantages of the new clause would be to introduce some transparency and accountability. As my hon. Friend the Member for Epsom and Ewell (Chris Grayling) said on Second Reading:"““There is no point in giving our pensioners free bus travel if they just have to pay the bills through their council tax instead.””—[Official Report, 14 May 2007; Vol. 460, c. 414.]" The review, to be reported to Parliament, would allow local authorities to demonstrate to what degree the Government were providing free bus travel, and to what degree the Government were clobbering them to provide it.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 462 c518-9
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disability Bus services Buses Concessions Fares Finance Greater London Mental illness Older people Tourism Rural areas
- Legislation
- Concessionary Bus Travel Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:15:17 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_406577
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_406577
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_406577