Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Evans of Temple Guiting (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 10 July 2007. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Building Societies (Funding) and Mutual Societies (Transfers) Bill.


Building Societies (Funding) and Mutual Societies (Transfers) Bill

moved Amendment No. 4: 4: Clause 3, page 4, line 10, leave out from second ““a”” to end of line 13 and insert ““relevant company—”” The noble Lord said: The fourth and fifth amendments introduce the term ““relevant company”” in Clause 3 and define this term. The effect is that a transfer of a mutual society’s business under the modified procedures could be to a UK company or to a body corporate incorporated in any other EEA state, provided that that company or body is controlled by another mutual society. Again, this is intended to reduce the risk of breaching EC law. Under Clause 3 as it stands, a mutual in another EEA state would have to establish a UK company subsidiary in order to benefit from the changes. That could put it at a disadvantage, as it might face more practical difficulties establishing and running a UK company subsidiary than a UK mutual would. The changes ensure that UK and EEA mutual societies wishing to acquire other mutual societies are treated equally on a level playing field. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
693 c1359 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Building societies Finance Fees and charges Insolvency Financial Services Authority Powers Mutual societies
Legislation
Building Societies (Funding) and Mutual Societies (Transfers) Bill 2006-07
Financial Mutuals Arrangements Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk