Proceeding contribution from Baroness Teather (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 12 July 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Further Education and Training Bill [Lords].
Further Education and Training Bill [Lords]
I still do not really understand the Minister’s point about the degrees being second class, particularly if we get rid of franchising. We discussed the issue in Committee, where I tried to explain that there were already a number of different classes of foundation degree. For example, there are foundation degrees that are validated by and delivered in HE institutions; foundation degrees that are validated by higher education institutions but delivered in further education institutions; and we now have further education validated courses delivered by FE institutions. Why, then, do we need further education validated courses delivered by another institution? It is not a matter of being second class: we already have three classes, so why do we need a fourth?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 462 c1683
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Devolution Apprentices Finance Further education Learning and Skills Council for England Qualifications Privy Council Schools Training Young people Wales Sixth form education Foundation degrees
- Legislation
- Further Education and Training Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:37:45 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_410672
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_410672
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_410672